Journal of Data Science

The reputation of the maximum pseudolikelihood estimator (MPLE) for Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGM) has undergone a drastic change over the past 30 years. While first receiving broad support, mainly due to its computational feasibility and the lack of alternatives, general opinions started to change with the introduction of approximate maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) methods that became practicable due to increasing computing power and the introduction of MCMC methods. Previous comparison studies appear to yield contradicting results regarding the preference of these two point estimators; however, there is consensus that the prevailing method to obtain an MPLE’s standard error by the inverse Hessian matrix generally underestimates standard errors. We propose replacing the inverse Hessian matrix by an approximation of the Godambe matrix that results in confidence intervals with appropriate coverage rates and that, in addition, enables examining for model degeneracy. Our results also provide empirical evidence for the asymptotic normality of the MPLE under certain conditions.

We propose a scalable Bayesian network learning algorithm based on sparse Cholesky decomposition. Our approach only requires observational data and user-specified confidence level as inputs and can estimate networks with thousands of variables. The computational complexity of the proposed method is $O({p^{3}})$ for a graph with p vertices. Extensive numerical experiments illustrate the usefulness of our method with promising results. In simulation, the initial step in our approach also improves an alternative Bayesian network structure estimation method that uses an undirected graph as an input.

Causal inference can estimate causal effects, but unless data are collected experimentally, statistical analyses must rely on pre-specified causal models. Causal discovery algorithms are empirical methods for constructing such causal models from data. Several asymptotically correct discovery methods already exist, but they generally struggle on smaller samples. Moreover, most methods focus on very sparse causal models, which may not always be a realistic representation of real-life data generating mechanisms. Finally, while causal relationships suggested by the methods often hold true, their claims about causal non-relatedness have high error rates. This non-conservative error trade off is not ideal for observational sciences, where the resulting model is directly used to inform causal inference: A causal model with many missing causal relations entails too strong assumptions and may lead to biased effect estimates. We propose a new causal discovery method that addresses these three shortcomings: Supervised learning discovery (SLdisco). SLdisco uses supervised machine learning to obtain a mapping from observational data to equivalence classes of causal models. We evaluate SLdisco in a large simulation study based on Gaussian data and we consider several choices of model size and sample size. We find that SLdisco is more conservative, only moderately less informative and less sensitive towards sample size than existing procedures. We furthermore provide a real epidemiological data application. We use random subsampling to investigate real data performance on small samples and again find that SLdisco is less sensitive towards sample size and hence seems to better utilize the information available in small datasets.

Vaccine efficacy is a key index to evaluate vaccines in initial clinical trials during the development of vaccines. In particular, it plays a crucial role in authorizing Covid-19 vaccines. It has been reported that Covid-19 vaccine efficacy varies with a number of factors, including demographics of population, time after vaccine administration, and virus strains. By examining clinical trial data of three Covid-19 vaccine studies, we find that current approach to evaluating vaccines with an overall efficacy does not provide desired accuracy. It requires no time frame during which a candidate vaccine is evaluated, and is subject to misuse, resulting in potential misleading information and interpretation. In particular, we illustrate with clinical trial data that the variability of vaccine efficacy is underestimated. We demonstrate that a new method may help to address these caveats. It leads to accurate estimation of the variation of efficacy, provides useful information to define a reasonable time frame to evaluate vaccines, and avoids misuse of vaccine efficacy and misleading information.

Analyzing “large p small n” data is becoming increasingly paramount in a wide range of application fields. As a projection pursuit index, the Penalized Discriminant Analysis ($\mathrm{PDA}$) index, built upon the Linear Discriminant Analysis ($\mathrm{LDA}$) index, is devised in Lee and Cook (2010) to classify high-dimensional data with promising results. Yet, there is little information available about its performance compared with the popular Support Vector Machine ($\mathrm{SVM}$). This paper conducts extensive numerical studies to compare the performance of the $\mathrm{PDA}$ index with the $\mathrm{LDA}$ index and $\mathrm{SVM}$, demonstrating that the $\mathrm{PDA}$ index is robust to outliers and able to handle high-dimensional datasets with extremely small sample sizes, few important variables, and multiple classes. Analyses of several motivating real-world datasets reveal the practical advantages and limitations of individual methods, suggesting that the $\mathrm{PDA}$ index provides a useful alternative tool for classifying complex high-dimensional data. These new insights, along with the hands-on implementation of the $\mathrm{PDA}$ index functions in the R package classPP, facilitate statisticians and data scientists to make effective use of both sets of classification tools.

The least squares (LS) estimator of the autoregressive coefficient in the bifurcating autoregressive (BAR) model was recently shown to suffer from substantial bias, especially for small to moderate samples. This study investigates the impact of the bias in the LS estimator on the behavior of various types of bootstrap confidence intervals for the autoregressive coefficient and introduces methods for constructing bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals. We first describe several bootstrap confidence interval procedures for the autoregressive coefficient of the BAR model and present their bias-corrected versions. The behavior of uncorrected and corrected confidence interval procedures is studied empirically through extensive Monte Carlo simulations and two real cell lineage data applications. The empirical results show that the bias in the LS estimator can have a significant negative impact on the behavior of bootstrap confidence intervals and that bias correction can significantly improve the performance of bootstrap confidence intervals in terms of coverage, width, and symmetry.

Deep residual networks (ResNets) have shown state-of-the-art performance in various real-world applications. Recently, the ResNets model was reparameterized and interpreted as solutions to a continuous ordinary differential equation or Neural-ODE model. In this study, we propose a neural generalized ordinary differential equation (Neural-GODE) model with layer-varying parameters to further extend the Neural-ODE to approximate the discrete ResNets. Specifically, we use nonparametric B-spline functions to parameterize the Neural-GODE so that the trade-off between the model complexity and computational efficiency can be easily balanced. It is demonstrated that ResNets and Neural-ODE models are special cases of the proposed Neural-GODE model. Based on two benchmark datasets, MNIST and CIFAR-10, we show that the layer-varying Neural-GODE is more flexible and general than the standard Neural-ODE. Furthermore, the Neural-GODE enjoys the computational and memory benefits while performing comparably to ResNets in prediction accuracy.

One of the major climatic interests of the last decades has been to understand and describe the rainfall patterns of specific areas of the world as functions of other climate covariates. We do it for the historical climate monitoring data from Tegucigalpa, Honduras, using non-homogeneous hidden Markov models (NHMMs), which are dynamic models usually used to identify and predict heterogeneous regimes. For estimating the NHMM in an efficient and scalable way, we propose the stochastic Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm and a Bayesian method, and compare their performance in synthetic data. Although these methodologies have already been used for estimating several other statistical models, it is not the case of NHMMs which are still widely fitted by the traditional EM algorithm. We observe that, under tested conditions, the performance of the Bayesian and stochastic EM algorithms is similar and discuss their slight differences. Analyzing the Honduras rainfall data set, we identify three heterogeneous rainfall periods and select temperature and humidity as relevant covariates for explaining the dynamic relation among these periods.

Malignant mesotheliomas are aggressive cancers that occur in the thin layer of tissue that covers most commonly the linings of the chest or abdomen. Though the cancer itself is rare and deadly, early diagnosis will help with treatment and improve outcomes. Mesothelioma is usually diagnosed in the later stages. Symptoms are similar to other, more common conditions. As such, predicting and diagnosing mesothelioma early is essential to starting early treatment for a cancer that is often diagnosed too late. The goal of this comprehensive empirical comparison is to determine the best-performing model based on recall (sensitivity). We particularly wish to avoid false negatives, as it is costly to diagnose a patient as healthy when they actually have cancer. Model training will be conducted based on k-fold cross validation. Random forest is chosen as the optimal model. According to this model, age and duration of asbestos exposure are ranked as the most important features affecting diagnosis of mesothelioma.

Traditional methods for evaluating a potential treatment have focused on the average treatment effect. However, there exist situations where individuals can experience significantly heterogeneous responses to a treatment. In these situations, one needs to account for the differences among individuals when estimating the treatment effect. Li et al. (2022) proposed a method based on random forest of interaction trees (RFIT) for a binary or categorical treatment variable, while incorporating the propensity score in the construction of random forest. Motivated by the need to evaluate the effect of tutoring sessions at a Math and Stat Learning Center (MSLC), we extend their approach to an ordinal treatment variable. Our approach improves upon RFIT for multiple treatments by incorporating the ordered structure of the treatment variable into the tree growing process. To illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed method, we conduct simulation studies where the results show that our proposed method has a lower mean squared error and higher optimal treatment classification, and is able to identify the most important variables that impact the treatment effect. We then apply the proposed method to estimate how the number of visits to the MSLC impacts an individual student’s probability of passing an introductory statistics course. Our results show that every student is recommended to go to the MSLC at least once and some can drastically improve their chance of passing the course by going the optimal number of times suggested by our analysis.