Evaluating a Method for Georeferencing Agricultural Fields✩
Volume 22, Issue 3 (2024): Special issue: The Government Advances in Statistical Programming (GASP) 2023 conference, pp. 423–435
Pub. online: 9 August 2024
Type: Data Science In Action
Open Access
✩
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.
Received
13 December 2023
13 December 2023
Accepted
2 July 2024
2 July 2024
Published
9 August 2024
9 August 2024
Abstract
The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) has begun a modernization effort to supplement survey data with non-survey data to improve estimation of agricultural quantities. As part of this effort, NASS has begun georeferencing farms on its list frame by linking geospatial data on agricultural fields with farm records on the list frame. Although many farms can be linked to geospatial data acquired by the Farm Service Agency (FSA), this linkage is not possible for farmers who do not participate in FSA programs, which may include members of some underrepresented groups in US agriculture. Thus, NASS has developed a georeferencing process for non-FSA farms, combining automatic and manual field identification, county assessor parcel data, record linkage, and classification surveys. This process serves the dual purpose of linking farms already on the list frame to geospatial data sources and identifying new farms to add to NASS’s list frame. This report evaluates the output of the non-FSA georeferencing process for 11 states, with a focus on farms added to the list frame via georeferencing. Substantial percentages (>25% for each category) of the new farms added via georeferencing were urban or suburban farms, were small, had livestock, or were in counties with Amish settlements. The georeferencing process shows promise adding farms from these groups that have historically been less well covered in NASS surveys.
Supplementary material
Supplementary MaterialThe primary data used in this paper are CIPSEA protected and are not allowed to be distributed by law.
References
AgriData, Inc (2008). FSA field boundaries (CLU) – May 2008. https://www.agridatainc.com/Home/Products/Mapping. Accessed: 2023-12-08.
Boryan C, Yang Z, Mueller R, Craig M (2011). Monitoring US agriculture: The US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Cropland Data Layer program. Geocarto International, 26(5): 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2011.562309
Cross JA (2003). Amish surnames, settlement patterns, and migration. Names, 51(3/4): 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.2003.51.3-4.193
Cross JA (2006). Restructuring America’s dairy farms. Geographical Review, 96(1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2006.tb00385.x
Cross JA (2014). Continuity and change: Amish dairy farming in Wisconsin over the past decade. Geographical Review, 104(1): 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2014.12004.x
Escalante CL, Brooks RL, Epperson JE, Stegelin FE (2006). Credit risk assessment and racial minority lending at the Farm Service Agency. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 38(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800022070
Esri (2009). World Imagery. https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=10df2279f9684e4a9f6a7f08febac2a9#!. Accessed: 2023-09-18.
Harter R, English N (2018). Overview of three field methods for improving coverage of address-based samples for in-person interviews. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 6(3): 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx037
Heard J (2002). USDA establishes a common land unit. http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/0402/usda.html.
Holly MA, Gunn KM, Rotz CA, Kleinman PJA (2019). Management characteristics of Pennsylvania dairy farms. Applied Animal Science, 35(3): 325–338. https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2018-01833
Minkoff-Zern L, Sloat S (2017). A new era of civil rights? Latino immigrant farmers and exclusion at the United States Department of Agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values, 34: 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9756-6
National Bureau of Economic Research (2022). Census Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA) to Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) county crosswalk. https://www.nber.org/research/data/census-core-based-statistical-area-cbsa-federal-information-processing-series-fips-county-crosswalk. Accessed: 2023-03-02.
Pebesma E (2018). Simple features for R: Standardized support for spatial vector data. The R Journal, 10(1): 439–446. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-009
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (2023). Crop production 2022 summary. https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/k3569432s/9306v916d/wm119139b/cropan23.pdf. Accessed: 2023-08-23.
Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan LD, François R, et al. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. The Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43): 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Young Center for Anabaptist and Pietist Studies, Elizabethtown College (2022). Amish population in the United States by state, county, and settlement, 2022. https://groups.etown.edu/amishstudies/files/2022/07/Amish-Pop-2022_by_state_and_county.pdf. Accessed: 2023-02-08.