Imbalanced datasets present a significant challenge for machine learning models, often leading to biased predictions. To address this issue, data augmentation techniques are widely used to generate new samples for the minority class. However, in this paper, we challenge the common assumption that data augmentation is necessary to improve predictions on imbalanced datasets. Instead, we argue that adjusting the classifier cutoffs without data augmentation can produce similar results to oversampling techniques. Our study provides theoretical and empirical evidence to support this claim. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of the strengths and limitations of different approaches to dealing with imbalanced data, and help researchers and practitioners make informed decisions about which methods to use for a given task.