Journal of Data Science logo


Login Register

  1. Home
  2. Issues
  3. Volume 14, Issue 4 (2016)
  4. An Empirical Comparison of Block Bootstr ...

Journal of Data Science

Submit your article Information
  • Article info
  • Related articles
  • More
    Article info Related articles

An Empirical Comparison of Block Bootstrap Methods: Traditional and Newer Ones
Volume 14, Issue 4 (2016), pp. 641–656
Beste H. Beyaztas   Esin Firuzan  

Authors

 
Placeholder
https://doi.org/10.6339/JDS.201610_14(4).0004
Pub. online: 4 August 2022      Type: Research Article      Open accessOpen Access

Published
4 August 2022

Abstract

Abstract: In this study, we compared various block bootstrap methods in terms of parameter estimation, biases and mean squared errors (MSE) of the bootstrap estimators. Comparison is based on four real-world examples and an extensive simulation study with various sample sizes, parameters and block lengths. Our results reveal that ordered and sufficient ordered non-overlapping block bootstrap methods proposed by Beyaztas et al. (2016) provide better results in terms of parameter estimation and its MSE compared to conventional methods. Also, sufficient non-overlapping block bootstrap method and its ordered version have the smallest MSE for the sample mean among the others.

Related articles PDF XML
Related articles PDF XML

Copyright
No copyright data available.

Keywords
Block bootstrap bootstrap estimation

Metrics
since February 2021
868

Article info
views

1163

PDF
downloads

Export citation

Copy and paste formatted citation
Placeholder

Download citation in file


Share


RSS

Journal of data science

  • Online ISSN: 1683-8602
  • Print ISSN: 1680-743X

About

  • About journal

For contributors

  • Submit
  • OA Policy
  • Become a Peer-reviewer

Contact us

  • JDS@ruc.edu.cn
  • No. 59 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District Beijing, 100872, P.R. China
Powered by PubliMill  •  Privacy policy