Journal of Data Science logo


Login Register

  1. Home
  2. To appear
  3. Rating Competitors in Games with Strengt ...

Journal of Data Science

Submit your article Information
  • Article info
  • More
    Article info

Rating Competitors in Games with Strength-Dependent Tie Probabilities
Mark E. Glickman ORCID icon link to view author Mark E. Glickman details  

Authors

 
Placeholder
https://doi.org/10.6339/25-JDS1209
Pub. online: 4 December 2025      Type: Statistical Data Science      Open accessOpen Access

Received
13 June 2025
Accepted
25 November 2025
Published
4 December 2025

Abstract

Competitor rating systems for head-to-head games are typically used to measure playing strength from game outcomes. Ratings computed from these systems are often used to select top competitors for elite events, for pairing players of similar strength in online gaming, and for players to track their own strength over time. Most implemented rating systems assume only win/loss outcomes, and treat occurrences of ties as the equivalent to half a win and half a loss. However, in games such as chess, the probability of a tie (draw) is demonstrably higher for stronger players than for weaker players, so that rating systems ignoring this aspect of game results may produce strength estimates that are unreliable. We develop a new rating system for head-to-head games based on a model that explicitly acknowledges that a tie may depend on the strengths of the competitors. The approach uses a Bayesian dynamic modeling framework. Within each time period, posterior updates are computed in closed form using a single Newton-Raphson iteration evaluated at the prior mean. The approach is demonstrated on a large dataset of chess games played in International Correspondence Chess Federation tournaments.

Supplementary material

 Supplementary Material
• Appendices.pdf: Appendices A and B. • Code_and_Data.zip: Zip file consisting of code and data to run the analyses in this manuscript.

References

 
Bhat CR (1995). A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice. Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological, 29(6): 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(95)00015-6
 
Boys R, Dunsmore I (1987). Diagnostic and sampling models in screening. Biometrika, 74(2): 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/74.2.365
 
Bradley RA, Terry ME (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39(3/4): 324–345. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334029
 
Crouch EA, Spiegelman D (1990). The evaluation of integrals of the form ${\textstyle\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }}f(t)\exp (-{t^{2}})$: Application to logistic-normal models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(410): 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1990.10476222
 
David H (1988). The Method of Paired Comparisons. Charles Griffin & Company, London.
 
Davidson RR (1970). On extending the Bradley-Terry model to accommodate ties in paired comparison experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(329): 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1970.10481082
 
Davidson RR, Beaver RJ (1977). On extending the Bradley-Terry model to incorporate within-pair order effects. Biometrics, 33(4): 693–702. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529467
 
Durbin J, Koopman SJ (2012). Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods, volume 38. OUP, Oxford.
 
Elo AE (1978). The Rating of Chess Players, Past and Present. Arco Publishing, New York.
 
Fahrmeir L, Tutz G (1994). Dynamic stochastic models for time-dependent ordered paired comparison systems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(428): 1438–1449. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476882
 
Florez M, Guindani M, Vannucci M (2025). Bayesian bivariate Conway–Maxwell–Poisson regression model for correlated count data in sports. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 21(1): 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2024-0072
 
Glickman ME (1993). Paired comparison models with time-varying parameters, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University.
 
Glickman ME (1995). A comprehensive guide to chess ratings. American Chess Journal, 3(1): 59–102.
 
Glickman ME (1999). Parameter estimation in large dynamic paired comparison experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C. Applied Statistics, 48(3): 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00159
 
Glickman ME (2001). Dynamic paired comparison models with stochastic variances. Journal of Applied Statistics, 28(6): 673–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760120059219
 
Glickman ME (2025). Paired comparison models with strength-dependent ties and order effects. Statistical Modelling. In press. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X251400474.
 
Glickman ME, Jones AC (2024). Models and rating systems for head-to-head competition. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 12: 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-040722-061813
 
Gorgi P, Koopman SJ, Lit R (2019). The analysis and forecasting of tennis matches by using a high dimensional dynamic model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A. Statistics in Society, 182(4): 1393–1409. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12464
 
Harding MC, Hausman J (2007). Using a Laplace approximation to estimate the random coefficients logit model by nonlinear least squares. International Economic Review, 48(4): 1311–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2007.00463.x
 
Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1986). Generalized additive models. Statistical Science, 1(3): 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177013604
 
Ingram M (2021). How to extend Elo: A Bayesian perspective. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 17(3): 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2020-0066
 
Karlis D, Ntzoufras I (2003). Analysis of sports data by using bivariate Poisson models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D. The Statistician, 52(3): 381–393.
 
Karlis D, Ntzoufras I (2005). Bivariate Poisson and diagonal inflated bivariate Poisson regression models in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 14: 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v014.i10
 
Knorr-Held L (2000). Dynamic rating of sports teams. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D. The Statistician, 49(2): 261–276.
 
Nelder JA, Mead R (1965). A simplex method for function minimization. The Computer Journal, 7(4): 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
 
Pirjol D (2013). The logistic-normal integral and its generalizations. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 237(1): 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2012.06.016
 
Pryanishnikov I, Zigova K (2016). Multinomial logit models for the Austrian labor market. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 32(4): 267–282. https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v32i4.461
 
Steen N, Byrne G, Gelbard E (1969). Gaussian quadratures for the integrals ${\textstyle\int _{0}^{\infty }}{e^{-{x^{2}}}}f(x)dx$ and ${\textstyle\int _{0}^{b}}{e^{-{x^{2}}}}f(x)dx$. Mathematics of Computation, 23(107): 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1969-0247744-3
 
Szczecinski L, Djebbi A (2020). Understanding draws in Elo rating algorithm. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 16(3): 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2019-0102
 
West M, Harrison PJ, Migon HS (1985). Dynamic generalized linear models and Bayesian forecasting. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80(389): 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1985.10477131
 
Wood SN (2011). Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 73(1): 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x

PDF XML
PDF XML

Copyright
2025 The Author(s). Published by the School of Statistics and the Center for Applied Statistics, Renmin University of China.
by logo by logo
Open access article under the CC BY license.

Keywords
Bayesian dynamic generalized linear model Bradley-Terry model chess tournaments order effects Paired comparison models ranking models tie outcomes

Funding
This work was partially supported by the International Correspondence Chess Federation.

Metrics
since February 2021
1177

Article info
views

231

PDF
downloads

Export citation

Copy and paste formatted citation
Placeholder

Download citation in file


Share


RSS

Journal of data science

  • Online ISSN: 1683-8602
  • Print ISSN: 1680-743X

About

  • About journal

For contributors

  • Submit
  • OA Policy
  • Become a Peer-reviewer

Contact us

  • JDS@ruc.edu.cn
  • No. 59 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District Beijing, 100872, P.R. China
Powered by PubliMill  •  Privacy policy