Journal of Data Science

Abstract: In the paper, we propose power weighted quantile regression(PWQR), which can reduce the effect of heterogeneous of the conditional densities of the response effectively and improve efficiency of quantile regression). In addition to PWQR, this article also proves that all the weighting of those that the actual value is less than the estimated value of PWQR and the proportion of all the weighting is very close to the corresponding quantile. At last, this article establishes the relationship between Geomagentic Indices and GIC. According to the problems of power system security operation, we make GIC risk value table. This table can have stronger practical operation ability, can provide power system security operation with important inferences.

This paper empirically investigates the impact of the government bailout on analysts’ forecast optimism regardingfirms in the automotive industry. We compare the results from M- and MM-robust methodologies to the results from OLS regression in an event study context and find that inferences change. When M- and MM-robust estimation methods are used to estimate the same model, the results for key control variables fall directly in line with those of similar previous studies. Furthermore, an analysis of residuals indicates that the application of M- and MM estimation methods pulls the main prediction equation towards the main sample data, suggesting a more rigorous fit. Based on robust methods, we observe changes in analyst optimism during the announcement period of the bailout, as evidenced by the significantly positive variable of interest. We support our empirical results with simulations and confirm significant improvements in estimation accuracy when robust regression methods are applied to the samples contaminated by outliers.

The paper deals with robust ANCOVA when there are one or two covariates. Let Mj (Y |X) = β0j + β1j X1 + β2j X2 be some conditional measure of location associated with the random variable Y , given X, where β0j , β1j and β2j are unknown parameters. A basic goal is testing the hypothesis H0: M1(Y |X) = M2(Y |X). A classic ANCOVA method is aimed at addressing this goal, but it is well known that violating the underlying assumptions (normality, parallel regression lines and two types of homoscedasticity) create serious practical concerns. Methods are available for dealing with heteroscedasticity and nonnormality, and there are well-known techniques for controlling the probability of one or more Type I errors. But some practical concerns remain, which are reviewed in the paper. An alternative approach is suggested and found to have a distinct power advantage.

Abstract: Traditional loss reserves models focus on the mean of the conditional loss distribution. If the factors driving high claims differ systematically from those driving medium to low claims, alternative models that differentiate such differences are required. We propose quantile regression model loss reserving as the model offers potentially different solutions at distinct quantiles so that the effects of risk factors are differentiated at different points of the conditional loss distribution. Due to its nonparametric nature, quantile regression is free of the model assumptions for traditional mean regression models, including homogeneous variance across risk factors and symmetric and light tails, etc. These model assumptions have posed a great barrier in applications as they are often not met in the claim data. Using two sets of run-off triangle claim data from Israel and Queensland, Australia, we present the quantile regression approach that illustrates the sensitivity of claim size to risk factors, namely the trend pattern and initial claim level, in different quantiles. Trained models are applied to predict future claims in the lower run-off triangle. Findings suggest that reliance on standard loss reserves techniques gives rise to misleading inferences and that claim size is not homogeneously driven by the same risk factors across quantiles.