This paper empirically investigates the impact of the government bailout on analysts’ forecast optimism regardingfirms in the automotive industry. We compare the results from M- and MM-robust methodologies to the results from OLS regression in an event study context and find that inferences change. When M- and MM-robust estimation methods are used to estimate the same model, the results for key control variables fall directly in line with those of similar previous studies. Furthermore, an analysis of residuals indicates that the application of M- and MM estimation methods pulls the main prediction equation towards the main sample data, suggesting a more rigorous fit. Based on robust methods, we observe changes in analyst optimism during the announcement period of the bailout, as evidenced by the significantly positive variable of interest. We support our empirical results with simulations and confirm significant improvements in estimation accuracy when robust regression methods are applied to the samples contaminated by outliers.
Abstract: The power law process (PLP) (i.e., the nonhomogeneous Poisson process with power intensity law) is perhaps the most widely used model for analyzing failure data from reliability growth studies. Statistical inferences and prediction analyses for the PLP with left-truncated data with classical methods were extensively studied by Yu et al. (2008) recently. However, the topics discussed in Yu et al. (2008) only included maximum likelihood estimates and confidence intervals for parameters of interest, hypothesis testing and goodness-of-fit test. In addition, the prediction limits of future failure times for failure-truncated case were also discussed. In this paper, with Bayesian method we consider seven totally different prediciton issues besides point estimates and prediction limits for xn+k. Specifically, we develop estimation and prediction methods for the PLP in the presence of left-truncated data by using the Bayesian method. Bayesian point and credible interval estimates for the parameters of interest are derived. We show how five single-sample and three two-sample issues are addressed by the proposed Bayesian method. Two real examples from an engine development program and a repairable system are used to illustrate the proposed methodologies.
This article presents a classification of disease severity for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). CF is a genetic disease that dramatically decreases life expectancy and quality. The disease is characterized by polymicrobial infections which lead to lung remodeling and airway mucus plugging. In order to quantify disease severity of CF patients and compute a continuous severity index measure, quantile regression, rank scores, and corresponding normalized ranks are calculated for CF patients. Based on the rank scores calculated from the set of quantile regression models, a continuous severity index is computed for each CF patient and can be considered a robust estimate of CF disease severity.