Journal of Data Science

Abstract: Different models are used in practice for describing a binary lon gitudinal data. In this paper we consider the joint probability models, the marginal models, and the combined models for describing such data the best. The combined model consists of a joint probability model and a marginal model at two different levels. We present some striking empirical observa tions on the closeness of the estimates and their standard errors for some parameters of the models considered in describing a data from Fitzmaurice and Laird (1993) and consequently giving new insight from this data. We present the data in a complete factorial arrangement with 4 factors at 2 levels. We introduce the concept of “data representing a model completely” and explain “data balance” as well as “chance balance”. We also consider the best model selection problem for describing this data and use the Search Linear Model concepts known in Fractional Factorial Design research (Sri vastava (1975)).

Abstract: Incomplete data are common phenomenon in research that adopts the longitudinal design approach. If incomplete observations are present in the longitudinal data structure, ignoring it could lead to bias in statistical inference and interpretation. We adopt the disposition model and extend it to the analysis of longitudinal binary outcomes in the presence of monotone incomplete data. The response variable is modeled using a conditional logistic regression model. The nonresponse mechanism is assumed ignorable and developed as a combination of Markov’s transition and logistic regression model. MLE method is used for parameter estimation. Application of our approach to rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials is presented.

Abstract: Fisher’s exact test (FET) is a conditional method that is frequently used to analyze data in a 2 × 2 table for small samples. This test is conservative and attempts have been made to modify the test to make it less conservative. For example, Crans and Shuster (2008) proposed adding more points in the rejection region to make the test more powerful. We provide another way to modify the test to make it less conservative by using two independent binomial distributions as the reference distribution for the test statistic. We compare our new test with several methods and show that our test has advantages over existing methods in terms of control of the type 1 and type 2 errors. We reanalyze results from an oncology trial using our proposed method and our software which is freely available to the reader.

Abstract: Interval estimation for the proportion parameter in one-sample misclassified binary data has caught much interest in the literature. Re cently, an approximate Bayesian approach has been proposed. This ap proach is simpler to implement and performs better than existing frequen tist approaches. However, because a normal approximation to the marginal posterior density was used in this Bayesian approach, some efficiency may be lost. We develop a closed-form fully Bayesian algorithm which draws a posterior sample of the proportion parameter from the exact marginal posterior distribution. We conducted simulations to show that our fully Bayesian algorithm is easier to implement and has better coverage than the approximate Bayesian approach.