Journal of Data Science

In the evolving field of survey research, leveraging machine learning to predict response behavior has transformative potential for the efficiency of survey operations. Integrating multiple data sources may improve response prediction by providing more nuanced insights for household outreach. This study presents a model-driven approach to enhancing respondent cooperation in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) by combining features from disparate data sources. MEPS is a longitudinal household survey with 5 rounds of interviewing over 2.5 years. Its sample is derived prior National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) participants. MEPS Round 1 response rates are critical for sustaining representativeness throughout each panel. In this study, we constructed a multimodal machine learning model to predict (1) the likelihood of a positive response for an upcoming contact attempt and (2) the likelihood that new panel households complete a Round 1 interview. The model integrates tract-level data from the American Community Survey (ACS), outcomes from the Advance Call Records (ACR) made prior to MEPS Round 1, and paradata from the early contact period. We also explored the relative contributions of these sources to model performance. Our model aims to help manage field labor by identifying complex cases needing specialized support. It can also assist in determining the optimal mode for the next contact to increase the chance of a completed interview. Beyond improving MEPS operations, this study offers a roadmap for incorporating additional data sources to support fieldwork.

Physician performance is critical to caring for patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), who are in life-threatening situations and require high level medical care and interventions. Evaluating physicians is crucial for ensuring a high standard of medical care and fostering continuous performance improvement. The non-randomized nature of ICU data often results in imbalance in patient covariates across physician groups, making direct comparisons of the patients’ survival probabilities for each physician misleading. In this article, we utilize the propensity weighting method to address confounding, achieve covariates balance, and assess physician effects. Due to possible model misspecification, we compare the performance of the propensity weighting methods using both parametric models and super learning methods. When the generalized propensity or the quality function is not correctly specified within the parametric propensity weighting framework, super learning-based propensity weighting methods yield more efficient estimators. We demonstrate that utilizing propensity weighting offers an effective way to assess physician performance, a topic of considerable interest to hospital administrators.

Statistical learning methods have been growing in popularity in recent years. Many of these procedures have parameters that must be tuned for models to perform well. Research has been extensive in neural networks, but not for many other learning methods. We looked at the behavior of tuning parameters for support vector machines, gradient boosting machines, and adaboost in both a classification and regression setting. We used grid search to identify ranges of tuning parameters where good models can be found across many different datasets. We then explored different optimization algorithms to select a model across the tuning parameter space. Models selected by the optimization algorithm were compared to the best models obtained through grid search to select well performing algorithms. This information was used to create an R package, EZtune, that automatically tunes support vector machines and boosted trees.

Anemia, especially among children, is a serious public health problem in Bangladesh. Apart from understanding the factors associated with anemia, it may be of interest to know the likelihood of anemia given the factors. Prediction of disease status is a key to community and health service policy making as well as forecasting for resource planning. We considered machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict the anemia status among children (under five years) using common risk factors as features. Data were extracted from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey- Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) conducted in 2011. In this study, a sample of 2013 children were selected for whom data on all selected variables was available. We used several ML algorithms such as linear discriminant analysis (LDA), classification and regression trees (CART), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF) and logistic regression (LR) to predict the childhood anemia status. A systematic evaluation of the algorithms was performed in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). We found that the RF algorithm achieved the best classification accuracy of 68.53% with a sensitivity of 70.73%, specificity of 66.41% and AUC of 0.6857. On the other hand, the classical LR algorithm reached a classification accuracy of 62.75% with a sensitivity of 63.41%, specificity of 62.11% and AUC of 0.6276. Among all considered algorithms, the k-NN gave the least accuracy. We conclude that ML methods can be considered in addition to the classical regression techniques when the prediction of anemia is the primary focus.

Predictive automation is a pervasive and archetypical example of the digital economy. Studying how Americans evaluate predictive automation is important because it affects corporate and state governance. However, we have relevant questions unanswered. We lack comparisons across use cases using a nationally representative sample. We also have yet to determine what are the key predictors of evaluations of predictive automation. This article uses the American Trends Panel’s 2018 wave ($n=4,594$) to study whether American adults think predictive automation is fair across four use cases: helping credit decisions, assisting parole decisions, filtering job applicants based on interview videos, and assessing job candidates based on resumes. Results from lasso regressions trained with 112 predictors reveal that people’s evaluations of predictive automation align with their views about social media, technology, and politics.