Journal of Data Science

Social network data often contain missing values because of the sensitive nature of the information collected and the dependency among the network actors. As a response, network imputation methods including simple ones constructed from network structural characteristics and more complicated model-based ones have been developed. Although past studies have explored the influence of missing data on social networks and the effectiveness of imputation procedures in many missing data conditions, the current study aims to evaluate a more extensive set of eight network imputation techniques (i.e., null-tie, Reconstruction, Preferential Attachment, Constrained Random Dot Product Graph, Multiple Imputation by Bayesian Exponential Random Graph Models or BERGMs, k-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, and Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations) under more practical conditions through comprehensive simulation. A factorial design for missing data conditions is adopted with factors including missing data types, missing data mechanisms, and missing data proportions, which are applied to generated social networks with varying numbers of actors based on 4 different sets of coefficients in ERGMs. Results show that the effectiveness of imputation methods differs by missing data types, missing data mechanisms, the evaluation criteria used, and the complexity of the social networks. More complex methods such as the BERGMs have consistently good performances in recovering missing edges that should have been present. While simpler methods like Reconstruction work better in recovering network statistics when the missing proportion of present edges is low, the BERGMs work better when more present edges are missing. The BERGMs also work well in recovering ERGM coefficients when the networks are complex and the missing data type is actor non-response. In conclusion, researchers analyzing social networks with incomplete data should identify the network structures of interest and the potential missing data types before selecting appropriate imputation methods.

We consider a continuous outcome subject to nonresponse and a fully observed covariate. We propose a spline proxy pattern-mixture model (S-PPMA), an extension of the proxy pattern-mixture model (PPMA) (Andridge and Little, 2011), to estimate the mean of the outcome under varying assumptions about nonresponse. S-PPMA improves the robustness of PPMA, which assumes bivariate normality between the outcome and the covariate, by modeling the relationship via a spline. Simulations indicate that S-PPMA outperforms PPMA when the data deviate from normality and are missing not at random, with minor losses of efficiency when the data are normal.

Early in the course of the pandemic in Colorado, researchers wished to fit a sparse predictive model to intubation status for newly admitted patients. Unfortunately, the training data had considerable missingness which complicated the modeling process. I developed a quick solution to this problem: Median Aggregation of penaLized Coefficients after Multiple imputation (MALCoM). This fast, simple solution proved successful on a prospective validation set. In this manuscript, I show how MALCoM performs comparably to a popular alternative (MI-lasso), and can be implemented in more general penalized regression settings. A simulation study and application to local COVID-19 data is included.