Journal of Data Science

Technological advances in software development effectively handled technical details that made life easier for data analysts, but also allowed for nonexperts in statistics and computer science to analyze data. As a result, medical research suffers from statistical errors that could be otherwise prevented such as errors in choosing a hypothesis test and assumption checking of models. Our objective is to create an automated data analysis software package that can help practitioners run non-subjective, fast, accurate and easily interpretable analyses. We used machine learning to predict the normality of a distribution as an alternative to normality tests and graphical methods to avoid their downsides. We implemented methods for detecting outliers, imputing missing values, and choosing a threshold for cutting numerical variables to correct for non-linearity before running a linear regression. We showed that data analysis can be automated. Our normality prediction algorithm outperformed the Shapiro-Wilk test in small samples with Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.5 vs. 0.16. The biggest drawback was that we did not find alternatives for statistical tests to test linear regression assumptions which are problematic in large datasets. We also applied our work to a dataset about smoking in teenagers. Because of the opensource nature of our work, these algorithms can be used in future research and projects.

Predictive automation is a pervasive and archetypical example of the digital economy. Studying how Americans evaluate predictive automation is important because it affects corporate and state governance. However, we have relevant questions unanswered. We lack comparisons across use cases using a nationally representative sample. We also have yet to determine what are the key predictors of evaluations of predictive automation. This article uses the American Trends Panel’s 2018 wave ($n=4,594$) to study whether American adults think predictive automation is fair across four use cases: helping credit decisions, assisting parole decisions, filtering job applicants based on interview videos, and assessing job candidates based on resumes. Results from lasso regressions trained with 112 predictors reveal that people’s evaluations of predictive automation align with their views about social media, technology, and politics.

Machine learning methods are increasingly applied for medical data analysis to reduce human efforts and improve our understanding of disease propagation. When the data is complicated and unstructured, shallow learning methods may not be suitable or feasible. Deep learning neural networks like multilayer perceptron (MLP) and convolutional neural network (CNN), have been incorporated in medical diagnosis and prognosis for better health care practice. For a binary outcome, these learning methods directly output predicted probabilities for patient’s health condition. Investigators still need to consider appropriate decision threshold to split the predicted probabilities into positive and negative regions. We review methods to select the cut-off values, including the relatively automatic methods based on optimization of the ROC curve criteria and also the utility-based methods with a net benefit curve. In particular, decision curve analysis (DCA) is now acknowledged in medical studies as a good complement to the ROC analysis for the purpose of decision making. In this paper, we provide the R code to illustrate how to perform the statistical learning methods, select decision threshold to yield the binary prediction and evaluate the accuracy of the resulting classification. This article will help medical decision makers to understand different classification methods and use them in real world scenario.