Community Detection in Google Searches Related to “Coronavirus”
Volume 19, Issue 2 (2021), pp. 334–347
Pub. online: 22 February 2021
Type: Data Science In Action
Received
9 November 2020
9 November 2020
Accepted
10 January 2021
10 January 2021
Published
22 February 2021
22 February 2021
Abstract
Coronavirus and the COVID-19 pandemic have substantially altered the ways in which people learn, interact, and discover information. In the absence of everyday in-person interaction, how do people self-educate while living in isolation during such times? More specifically, do communities emerge in Google search trends related to coronavirus? Using a suite of network and community detection algorithms, we scrape and mine all Google search trends in America related to an initial search for “coronavirus,” starting with the first Google search on the term (January 16, 2020) to recently (August 11, 2020). Results indicate a near-constant shift in the structure of how people educate themselves on coronavirus. Queries in the earliest days focusing on “Wuhan” and “China”, then shift to “stimulus checks” at the height of the virus in the U.S., and finally shift to queries related to local surges of new cases in later days. A few communities emerge surrounding terms more overtly related to coronavirus (e.g., “cases”, “symptoms”, etc.). Yet, given the shift in related Google queries and the broader information environment, clear community structure for the full search space does not emerge.
Supplementary material
Supplementary MaterialThe following are included in online Supplementary Material:
–
Network Node Degrees (Full Network).
–
Network of Google Search Trends: January.
–
Network of Google Search Trends: February.
–
Network of Google Search Trends: March.
–
Network of Google Search Trends: April.
–
Network of Google Search Trends: May.
–
Network of Google Search Trends: June.
–
Network of Google Search Trends: July.
–
Network of Google Search Trends: August.
–
Replication R code.
References
Bastani P, Bahrami MA (2020). COVID-19 related misinformation on social media: A qualitative study from Iran. https://doi.org/10.2196/18932.
Cairney P, Wellstead A (2020). COVID-19: Effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public. Policy Design and Practice. Forthcoming, https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1837466
Croce MMM, Farroni P, Wolfskeil I (2020). When the markets get COVID: Contagion, viruses, and information diffusion. https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=14674.
Elmer T, Mepham K, Stadtfeld C (2020). Students under lockdown: Comparisons of students’ social networks and mental health before and during the COVID-19 crisis in Switzerland. PLoS ONE, 15(7): e0236337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236337.
Javan E, Fox SJ, Meyers LA (2020). Probability of current COVID-19 outbreaks in all us counties. The University of Texas at Austin Technical Report. https://cid.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/cid/files/covid-risk-maps_counties_4, 3.
Lehmiller JJ, Garcia JR, Gesselman AN, Mark KP (2020). Less sex, but more sexual diversity: Changes in sexual behavior during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Leisure Sciences. Forthcoming, https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1774016
McInnes L, Healy J, Melville J (2018). Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426.
Waggoner PD (2020). Pandemic policymaking: Learning the lower dimensional manifold of congressional responsiveness. arXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04763.