<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JDS</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Data Science</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1680-743X</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1680-743X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>SOSRUC</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">060204</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.6339/JDS.2008.06(2).411
</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>On the Principles of Believe the Positive and Believe the Negative for Diagnosis Using Two Continuous Tests</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Shen</surname>
            <given-names>Changyu</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_JDS_aff_000"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="j_JDS_aff_000">1Indiana University and 2Regenstrief Institute for Health Car2</aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <volume>6</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>189</fpage>
      <lpage>205</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>Abstract: Believe the Positive (BP) and Believe the Negative (BN) rules for combining two continuous diagnostic tests are compared with proce dures based on likelihood ratio and linear combination of the two tests. The sensitivity-specificity relationship for BP/BN is illustrated through a graph ical presentation of a ”ROC surface”, which leads to a natural approach of choosing between BP and BN. With a bivariate normal model, it is shown that the discriminating power of this approach is higher when the correla tion between the two tests has different signs for non-diseased and diseased population, given the location and variations of the two distributions are fixed. The idea is illustrated through an example.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
