<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JDS</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Data Science</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1680-743X</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1680-743X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>SOSRUC</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">070303</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.6339/JDS.2009.07(3).476
</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Measurement Errors and Imperfect Detection Rates on the Transect Line in Independent Observer Line Transect Surveys</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Kelly Fan</surname>
            <given-names>Shenghua</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>331</fpage>
      <lpage>347</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>Abstract: This paper proposes a parametric method for estimating animal abundance using data from independent observer line transect surveys. This method allows measurement errors in distance and size, and less than 100% detection rates on the transect line. Based on data from southern bluefin tuna surveys and data from a mike whale survey, simulation studies were conducted and the results show that 1) the proposed estimates agree well with the true values, 2) the effect of small measurement errors in distance could still be large if measurements on size are biased, and 3) incorrectly as suming 100% detection rates on the transect line will greatly underestimate the animal abundance.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>Imperfect detectability</kwd>
        <kwd>independent line transect surveys</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
