<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JDS</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Data Science</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1680-743X</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1680-743X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>SOSRUC</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">040401</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.6339/JDS.2006.04(4).369
</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Data Information in Contingency Tables: A Fallacy of Hierarchical Loglinear Models</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Cheng</surname>
            <given-names>Philip E.</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_JDS_aff_000"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="j_JDS_aff_000">Academia Sinica</aff>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Liou</surname>
            <given-names>Jiun W.</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_JDS_aff_001"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="j_JDS_aff_001">Academia Sinica</aff>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Liou</surname>
            <given-names>Michelle</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_JDS_aff_002"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="j_JDS_aff_002">Academia Sinica</aff>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Aston</surname>
            <given-names>John A. D.</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_JDS_aff_003"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="j_JDS_aff_003">Academia Sinica</aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>387</fpage>
      <lpage>398</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>Abstract: Information identities derived from entropy and relative entropy can be useful in statistical inference. For discrete data analyses, a recent study by the authors showed that the fundamental likelihood structure with categorical variables can be expressed in different yet equivalent information decompositions in terms of relative entropy. This clarifies an essential difference between the classical analysis of variance and the analysis of discrete data, revealing a fallacy in the analysis of hierarchical loglinear models. The discussion here is focused on the likelihood information of a three-way contingency table, without loss of generality. A classical three-way categorical data example is examined to illustrate the findings.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
